so I think the vouching system that Dunks is proposing here is only for New CRE8RS who have participated in 3 or fewer epochs (please correct me if Iām wrong here, Dunks)
How it usually works with the built-in vouching feature on Coordinape is:
New CRE8RS that have participated in 3 or fewer epochs will approach one of the āseasonedā CRE8RS (those that have participated in more than 3 epochs) and ask to get nominated
If the āseasonedā CRE8R would like to nominate this new cre8r then theyād use the ānominateā feature right on Coordinape.
The new CRE8R has 14 days to gather 2 more vouches in order to become eligible for Coordinape.
I also understand this, Maybe the first post should be updated with those infos.
But then it brings some āissuesā. It basically means that each epoch should run for at least 14 days. So people have time to vouch other members. And this should be done at the end of a contact. So if someone created content the last day, other member have time to vouch him/her. Meaning, epoch will basically be finished 2 weeks after the end of a contract.
No a real issue per-se. But current epoch are rather short (2-3 days) .so several epochs will probably be running at the same time
Also, how many people will be needed to vouch ?
You wanted to hide allocation to remove the āfriendā aspect. How would you deal about vouching and friendly vouching ?
In terms of the 14 day timeline. Perhaps new CRE8RS will need to make some content for free to begin with (which is the case for most DAOs) until they can be nominated and vouched in. In this case, the first epoch (or epochs if it takes a few tries to get nominated/vouched) they participate in they will not be able to get compensated. Thoughts?
Currently there are only a few CRE8RS that will need to be vouched. Maybe 2 or 3? We do have a few new CRE8RS that are just joining.
Friendly vouching is still vouching. Whoever vouches for another person should also be accountable for that personās work, somewhat. This is a responsibility. People should not take it lightly. Say if I vouched for someone who is caught plagiarizing then Iām accountable for that personās behaviour as well.
Some F100 person vouches them into a CoorApe circle for an individual project. if no one vouches them in, then they can still create content but wont be paid for it.
If they get paid, 3 times (3000usd? 2000usd?) they get the F100 still.
Once they get vouched into a circle, are they ok for all other project circles?
Is there is recourse for vouching in people that donāt qualify? (there is a dilution of GIBs already)
The original vouching systems was designed for ongoing circles that constantly grow in population.
Will there be a devouching system for nominating people out of circles?
Is anyone F100 auto into ALL circles?
These are good and very tough questions, Ceazor. I think we need to think about them.
Iād like to comment on some of the questions you brought up:
The idea is that once people get vouched in theyāre okay for all other project circles. This is an alternative to the ācontent filteringā system weāre currently using, which has been controversial.
Iām assuming all who have qualified for F100 are ones that have made quality content since theyāve earned $2000 from at least 3 epochs. So yes, F100 members are auto in all circles. Thatās just my thinking but am open to hear other ideas.